上海视觉

上海视觉 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 102-109.

• 艺术批评 • 上一篇    下一篇

艺术的事故——维利里奥对20世纪西方艺术的批判

付湛元   

  1. 中国人民大学北京 100872
  • 出版日期:2025-12-20 发布日期:2025-12-22
  • 作者简介:付湛元(1998— ),男,中国人民大学文学院博士在读。研究方向为当代美学,艺术理论与批评。

The Accident of Art: Virilio's Critique on Western Art of 20th Century

FU Zhanyuan   

  • Online:2025-12-20 Published:2025-12-22

摘要:

维利里奥以其独创的“事故学”为工具,对20世纪的西方艺术进行批判。他认为,世界大战等暴力事件是理解超现实主义、达达主义等先锋艺术的关键,浪漫主义的、欣悦的艺术创作在欧洲早已不知所终。而上述流派表现出的非人道主义和对身体的缺乏尊重在第二次世界大战后的西方艺术中愈演愈烈,艺术家们不但在创作中直接表现对身体的伤害,还大量使用基因编辑技术、仿生技术、体内/外移植等赛博格技术,公然与新兴的科学技术“结盟”,“后人类艺术”彻底摧毁了造型艺术的表征原则。最终,经由直播电视等实时的技术义肢,充斥非人道主义的西方当代艺术实践成为一种向全球直播的“总体事故”,新的“知觉后勤”击溃了主体的移情能力。

关键词: 维利里奥, 艺术的事故, 无情的艺术, 后人类

Abstract:

Virilio employed his original “accidentology” to critique 20th century Western art, arguing that violent events such as world wars were essential to understanding avant-garde movements like Surrealism and Dadaism. He noted that the romantic, euphoric art-making had vanished from Europe. The non-humanitarian perspective and disregard for the human body evident in these genres intensified in post-World War Ⅱ Western art. Artists not only explicitly portrayed bodily harm in their creations but also extensively incorporated gene editing, bionic technology, body transplantation, and other cyborg technologies. By openly aligning with emerging science and technology, “post-human art” dismantled the principle of representation in the plastic arts. Ultimately, through real-time technological prostheses such as live television, contemporary art practices infused with non-humanitarian elements became a form of “total accident” broadcasted globally, while the new “logistics of perception” undermined the subject’s capacity for empathy.

Key words: Paul Virilio, Accident of Art, Pitiless Art, Post-Human