上海视觉

上海视觉 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 156-162.

• 国际连线 • 上一篇    

艺术史可以突破线性透视法的约束吗?达米施与其师梅洛-庞蒂之间的分歧

卫俊   

  1. 法国里昂第三大学,里昂 69008
  • 出版日期:2025-01-20 发布日期:2025-05-08
  • 作者简介:卫俊(1995— ),男,北京大学哲学系硕士,法国里昂三大哲学系博士生。研究方向为艺术理论。

Can Art History Surpass Linear Perspective? Divergence Between Damisch and His Teacher Merleau-Ponty

WEI Jun   

  • Online:2025-01-20 Published:2025-05-08

摘要:

文艺复兴时期提出的线性透视法常常成为刻画艺术史发展脉络的核心节点,那么艺术史能否突破线性透视法的约束呢?本文聚焦于法国艺术史家达米施和他的老师、哲学家梅洛-庞蒂在这个问题上的分歧。在《透视法的起源》一书中,达米施在多个问题上都表达了与梅氏不同的看法,具体包括线性透视法是否只是文化惯例,现代艺术是否超越了线性透视法,以及艺术史是否突破了线性透视法。达米施倾向于认为线性透视法始终发挥范式作用,而梅氏则认为绘画表达和艺术史都可以超越线性透视法的束缚。透过二人观点上的分歧,我们也可以观察到哲学家与艺术史家在考察艺术问题时的差异。

关键词: 线性透视法, 达米施, 梅洛-庞蒂, 艺术史

Abstract:

The linear perspective method of the Renaissance often becomes a core node in depicting the developmental trajectory of art history. But can art history break through the constraints of linear perspective? This study focuses on the divergence between French art historian Damisch and his teacher, philosopher Merleau-Ponty, regarding this issue. In his book The Origin of Perspective, Damisch expresses different views from Merleau-Ponty on multiple questions, specifically including whether linear perspective is merely a cultural convention, whether modern art transcends linear perspective, and whether art history can break through linear perspective. Damisch tends to believe that linear perspective always plays a paradigmatic role, while Merleau-Ponty argues that pictorial expression and art history can overcome the constraints of linear perspective. Through the differences in their perspectives, we can also observe the distinctions between philosophers and art historians when examining artistic issues.

Key words: linear perspective, Damisch, Merleau-Ponty, art history