上海视觉

上海视觉 ›› 2023, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 115-122.

• 教学探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

浅议项目制课程的范式进化——浙江乡村营造课程实践启示

裴纹英   

  1. 上海视觉艺术学院,上海 201620
  • 出版日期:2023-02-20 发布日期:2023-12-26
  • 作者简介:裴纹英(1972 — ),女。毕业于法国卡蒙多设计大学,环境产品与室内设计硕士,台湾华梵大学东方人文思想,哲学在读博士。现为上海视觉艺术学院设计学院,环境设计专业教师,研究方向为地域振兴设计实践。

Primary research on the evolution of project-based curriculum paradigms: Enlightenment from Countryside Construction Courses in Zhejiang

PEI Wenying   

  • Online:2023-02-20 Published:2023-12-26

摘要:

艺术设计类院校以“为社会服务”为主轴展开项目制设计课程,并根据不同的设计类型在实践中形成自有的结构范式。但由于课程条件的约束,面对不同社会语境中的不同议题,现有的项目制课程也存在很多弊端。上海视觉艺术学院经过十多年的深耕探索,尤其是在乡村振兴设计实践方面,师生团队建设了完整的系统共建型项目制课程。课程从场域资源的再认识和再利用设计出发,用艺术活化地方,再到配合行动者共建地方服务系统,自下而上地由学生主导形成新的教学力量。不论是课程的设计组织、结构流程、社会服务路径,还是教学思维和逻辑层面的知识融摄、教学认知、教学方法论等方面,都为营造设计类项目制课程的新范式提供了实证基础。

关键词: 乡村振兴, 项目制课程, 思维逻辑, 结构范式

Abstract:

Art design universities carry out project-based design courses with the main axis of "serving the society", and form their own structural paradigms in practice according to different design types. However, due to the constraints of the course conditions, facing different issues in different social contexts, the existing project-based courses also have many disadvantages. After more than ten years of in-depth exploration, especially in the design practice of rural revitalization, the team of teachers and students of Shanghai Institute of Visual Arts has built a complete system of co-constructed project-based courses. The course starts from the re-recognition and reuse design of field resources, revitalizes the place with art, and then cooperates with actors to build a local service system, and forms a new teaching force led by students from bottom to top. Whether it is the design organization, structural process, social service path of the course, or the knowledge integration, teaching cognition, and teaching methodology at the level of teaching thinking and logic, it provides evidence for the creation of a new paradigm for design-based project-based courses.

Key words: rural revitalization, project-based curriculum, thinking logic, structural paradigm